Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2012.11.24 18:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:- They look for people with single accounts and no real option to multi box a web alt. My guess, the reason CCp are ignoring it. Dat tinfoil |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.11.24 18:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:Dat narrow minded innocence. Please tell me how a gank squad knows how many accounts any given pilot has. Please tell me how CCP is "ignoring a problem" rather than saying "working as intended". |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.11.24 18:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Marvin Narville wrote:At any rate, the OP is a thinly veiled attempt to have CCP change the system. Why you ask, well here's why:
1.The suggestions in this thread are well known, borderline common knowledge. 2. The OP isn't popping his forum cherry right now, he's seen all this before. 3. This is his third thread on the same topic, the other two have been locked, recently. 4. He was precise in his wording, he wants to "nullify" hi sec freighter ganking, not "mitigate", not "reduce", not "make less frequent or more difficult or more expensive", he simply wants to nullify freighter ganking. (see definition below before you try to further mince words)
(nullify [-ên-îl+¬-îfa+¬] vb -fies, -fying, -fied (tr) 1. (Law) to render legally void or of no effect 2. to render ineffective or useless; cancel out)
5. In order to make ganking ineffective, useless, or cancel it out...in otherwords to nullify it, you WOULD in fact have to change gameplay mechanics, as currently ganking is "possible" by definition.
TL;DR Yes, yes the OP is in fact "looking to CCP to change the system" This sounds almost exactly like a recent discussion that took place over mining barges.
Do you think CCP will make the same assumption, that freighter pilots are too stupid to fly their ships without help? |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.11.24 18:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:CCP know using autopilot isn't what it used to be. They do nothing. Probably because autopilot hasn't changed one bit. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
123
|
Posted - 2012.11.25 00:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Oopsy Bear wrote:Add Uedama and Niarja to your avoidance list and make a route going anywhere. See the problem? I made a route from Villore to Dodixie and I don't see a problem. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
124
|
Posted - 2012.11.25 00:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tesal wrote:Put cans of junk in your cargo hold. The list becomes so long they don't read it. There are programs that read the value for you. Simple copy->paste kind of things. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
124
|
Posted - 2012.11.25 06:15:00 -
[7] - Quote
Riddick Liddell wrote:Some Rando wrote:Riddick Liddell wrote:CCP know using autopilot isn't what it used to be. They do nothing. Probably because autopilot hasn't changed one bit. And yet you feel the need to take things out of context. It's a pattern I see with the forums here. It's called spin by the way. So, uh, mind telling me how autopilot isn't what it used to be? I know it'll auto-dock you now, seems like a marked improvement. |
|
|